<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unixbench Roundup for EC2, Joyent, and my Brand Spankin&#8217; new Macbook Pro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nullstyle.com/2008/03/31/unixbench-roundup-for-ec2-joyent-and-my-brand-spankin-new-macbook-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nullstyle.com/2008/03/31/unixbench-roundup-for-ec2-joyent-and-my-brand-spankin-new-macbook-pro/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:01:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.nullstyle.com/2008/03/31/unixbench-roundup-for-ec2-joyent-and-my-brand-spankin-new-macbook-pro/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Son Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nullstyle.com/2008/03/31/unixbench-roundup-for-ec2-joyent-and-my-brand-spankin-new-macbook-pro/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Under my test, ec2-small instance CentOS 5 32-bit only got a score of 51. The large instance got 111. If you run the instance 24/7, it&#039;s much more expensive for the same performance than running a dedicated server. The price you pay is for &quot;on-demand&quot;, not for replacement of a dedicated server.&lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under my test, ec2-small instance CentOS 5 32-bit only got a score of 51. The large instance got 111. If you run the instance 24/7, it&#039;s much more expensive for the same performance than running a dedicated server. The price you pay is for &quot;on-demand&quot;, not for replacement of a dedicated server.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.nullstyle.com/2008/03/31/unixbench-roundup-for-ec2-joyent-and-my-brand-spankin-new-macbook-pro/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nullstyle.com/2008/03/31/unixbench-roundup-for-ec2-joyent-and-my-brand-spankin-new-macbook-pro/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I should add that I am very happy with Joyent and am satisfied with the resolution to the issue.  I love the accelerator concept (easy vertical scaling) and now that I&#039;m on the new hardware everything is great.&lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add that I am very happy with Joyent and am satisfied with the resolution to the issue.  I love the accelerator concept (easy vertical scaling) and now that I&#039;m on the new hardware everything is great.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.nullstyle.com/2008/03/31/unixbench-roundup-for-ec2-joyent-and-my-brand-spankin-new-macbook-pro/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nullstyle.com/2008/03/31/unixbench-roundup-for-ec2-joyent-and-my-brand-spankin-new-macbook-pro/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been doing a lot of comparisons between a Joyent L accelerator and a 2 year old Toshiba laptop w/ a Pentium M (both with 1GB of RAM):&lt;/p&gt; 

&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One initial benchmark I ran was a slow query.  It took 8 seconds on my laptop and a whopping 6+ minutes on the Joyent Accelerator.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I contacted Joyent support.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Turns out Joyent has two different hardware configurations, one that is &quot;old&quot; and one that is &quot;new&quot;.  The &quot;old&quot; ones have dirt slow IO.  &lt;/p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After Joyent switched me to a 1GB accelerator on the &quot;new&quot; hardware, the same query now executes in between .8 seconds and 1.2 seconds (probably depending on the overall load on the box).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I suggest you contact support and verify that you&#039;re on the &quot;new&quot; hardware configuration at Joyent.  It took me a while to get this to happen... Joyent tried to blame the query, mysql, my app code, my my.cnf settings, etc.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks to this benchmark I&#039;ll probably give the query at try on a Large EC2 instance just to compare... &lt;/p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Note:  I think Joyent should be proactively getting people off of the atrocious &quot;old&quot; hardware config, but that does not seem to be the official policy.  a senior tech at Joyent told me that doing so is a &quot;least desirable option&quot; from his perspective.   What surprised me most about this was that Joyent was not proactive in moving people off of the old hardware.  Once the decision to move was made, everything went smoothly, but it was not fun trying to get anyone there to acknowledge that there are IO issues.  The first line of response is &quot;it must be your query, your my.cnf, or your app code&quot;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve been doing a lot of comparisons between a Joyent L accelerator and a 2 year old Toshiba laptop w/ a Pentium M (both with 1GB of RAM):</p> 

<p></p><p>One initial benchmark I ran was a slow query.  It took 8 seconds on my laptop and a whopping 6+ minutes on the Joyent Accelerator.</p> 

<p></p><p>So I contacted Joyent support.</p> 

<p></p><p>Turns out Joyent has two different hardware configurations, one that is &quot;old&quot; and one that is &quot;new&quot;.  The &quot;old&quot; ones have dirt slow IO.  </p> 

<p></p><p>After Joyent switched me to a 1GB accelerator on the &quot;new&quot; hardware, the same query now executes in between .8 seconds and 1.2 seconds (probably depending on the overall load on the box).</p> 

<p></p><p>So I suggest you contact support and verify that you&#039;re on the &quot;new&quot; hardware configuration at Joyent.  It took me a while to get this to happen&#8230; Joyent tried to blame the query, mysql, my app code, my my.cnf settings, etc.</p> 

<p></p><p>Thanks to this benchmark I&#039;ll probably give the query at try on a Large EC2 instance just to compare&#8230; </p> 

<p></p><p>Note:  I think Joyent should be proactively getting people off of the atrocious &quot;old&quot; hardware config, but that does not seem to be the official policy.  a senior tech at Joyent told me that doing so is a &quot;least desirable option&quot; from his perspective.   What surprised me most about this was that Joyent was not proactive in moving people off of the old hardware.  Once the decision to move was made, everything went smoothly, but it was not fun trying to get anyone there to acknowledge that there are IO issues.  The first line of response is &quot;it must be your query, your my.cnf, or your app code&quot;.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Flournoy</title>
		<link>http://www.nullstyle.com/2008/03/31/unixbench-roundup-for-ec2-joyent-and-my-brand-spankin-new-macbook-pro/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Flournoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nullstyle.com/2008/03/31/unixbench-roundup-for-ec2-joyent-and-my-brand-spankin-new-macbook-pro/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It would be interesting to see results from your MBP with CentOS 5 installed, to measure filesystem performance with the same kernel and filesystem type.&lt;/p&gt; 

&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, I suspect that the real issue is that 2.5&quot; laptop hard disks are quite slow (5400 rpm, usually) compared to desktop or server class hard disks.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to see results from your MBP with CentOS 5 installed, to measure filesystem performance with the same kernel and filesystem type.</p> 

<p></p><p>That said, I suspect that the real issue is that 2.5&quot; laptop hard disks are quite slow (5400 rpm, usually) compared to desktop or server class hard disks.</p> ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex MacCaw</title>
		<link>http://www.nullstyle.com/2008/03/31/unixbench-roundup-for-ec2-joyent-and-my-brand-spankin-new-macbook-pro/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex MacCaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nullstyle.com/2008/03/31/unixbench-roundup-for-ec2-joyent-and-my-brand-spankin-new-macbook-pro/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great stuff! And now for a bandwidth test...&lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff! And now for a bandwidth test&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
